Posted by: Simon
« on: November 21, 2007, 02:39:30 PM »I'm not sure that I agree with Iain that the play doesn't specify the gender of the four characters. There's no indication in the dramatis personae of gender and no notes in the text but the fact that Dean would need to change 'him's to 'her's is surely just one indication. I agree that breaking the symmetry could bring out new aspects but I think there must be better ways of doing it.
I think there would have to be a good artistic reason for changing the gender of a character in a play. I feel very strongly that not being able to cast the play correctly because you only have 1 male is not a good reason.
Also I think I'm correct in saying that changing the words of a play would be in breach of any clause in a performance contract that disallows additions, deletions and amendments to the text.
With 1 male and 3 female actors perhaps Dean should consider 4.48 Psychosis?
Simon
I think there would have to be a good artistic reason for changing the gender of a character in a play. I feel very strongly that not being able to cast the play correctly because you only have 1 male is not a good reason.
Also I think I'm correct in saying that changing the words of a play would be in breach of any clause in a performance contract that disallows additions, deletions and amendments to the text.
With 1 male and 3 female actors perhaps Dean should consider 4.48 Psychosis?
Simon