Ever loyal Russell fan, Mark Kermode, who reviews films for the BBC, asks why The Devils has not been released

www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/markkermode/posts/The-Devils-Demand

023. Ken's horror trilogy: "The Devils," "Gothic," and "Lair of the White Worm."

I know The Devils is called horror a lot, but I just don't see it.  To take another thoughtful classy film, The Exorcist- the latter is clearly horror.

And Gothic wouldn't make horror fans (I am one!!) happy- I like it for other reasons.  Lair is definitely horror (the horror comedy variety).

"032. probably Reed's best performance in any of Ken's films or in any film.

033. Yet, as the hero, he is not entirely likable."

Don't know, I like his character.  He is weak (having lovers etc) but that makes him human.
But yes, it is Reed's best performance.

Well, that was a kick in the head. I went to the world wide web to view the 9th 5 minute segment of Ken Russell's "The Devil," and the whole film had been removed for the normal reasons, which means copyright infringement. Till I can find it someplace else, or until I do something on Ken Russell's "Whore," from one of Ken's best to one of Ken's worst, I'll come up with something else. But, first, a final few notes on "The Devils."

046. That is not an actor playing Father Grandier. That is Father Grandier. Oliver Reed.

047. Hitchcock and Russell. Not only are the villains personable. They are almost likable. Somewhat common now, but almost a new concept, when they started out making films.

048. And I have to put "Women in Love" ahead of "The Devils," as Ken's best film. For the following reasons.
(a) It is better edited. Actually, "Women in Love" is the best edited film I have ever seen.
(b) The women in "Women in Love" give a better performance than the women in "The Devils."
(c.) And the humor in "The Devils" does not work all the time for me.

"The Devils" (1971) Ken Russell 7/23
The 7th 5 minute segment

032. probably Reed's best performance in any of Ken's films or in any film.

033. Yet, as the hero, he is not entirely likable.

034. And, if he is not entirely likable, the villains are not entirely unlikable.

035. The nails do not go there. Most of the time, they show a person being crucified with the nails being driven thru the palms of the hands, as here, when they were actually, historically, driven thru the wrists.

036. One just cannot take most of the hallucinations in Ken's films seriously, as they are so often overdone.

037. Unlike the chief character in "Lair of the White Worm," who seems to be always driven by lust, he chief character here is slowly turning from lust to love, but what about the women in his life, are they driven by lust, love, or something in-between?

To be continued . . .

"003. I loved the cardinal's glasses.
004. Towards the end of the segment, that is one of the two scenes I remember from the first time I saw the film"

Yes, one of my favourite bits, the king and the cardinal showing the battle between monarchy and religion which is a theme from the film.  The king wants Loudun to keep its independence, the cardinal (running the country) want to remove the city states so he can create a united France.

I tried to find out if the king actually did performance on stage.  I could not find anything in history books, but eventually reading the Three musketeers books by Dumas (set in this period) it is mentioned that the king did perform in shows.

Iain

"The Devils" (1971) Ken Russell 5/23
The 5th 5 minute segment.

018. Writers of the that day are apparently better screenwriters than those of 1971, as many of the lines in the film are taken from what was actually written at the time the film takes place.

019. Another fine performance from Oliver Reed.

020. Probably better than his performance in "Women in Love," as this role is the more difficult of the two to perform.

021. As this character is the more complex and complicated of the two characters.

022. At least, so far, the failure is in the female characters, at least in comparison to the female characters in "Women in Love."

023. Ken's horror trilogy: "The Devils," "Gothic," and "Lair of the White Worm."

024. Round and round again we go. Again the camera follows the person above it, as he walks in circles above the camera. "Lair of the White Worm."

025. For someone who is down on realistm in films, Ken's films are often realistic in some area or the other: the historical facts in "The Devils," the backstage scenes in "The Boy Friend," the relationships in "Lair of the White Worm," etc.

026. The delay between the start of the film and the appearance of the primary character: Father Grandier (Oliver Reed) in "The Devils," Lady Sylvia Marsh (Amanda Donohoe) in "Lair of the White Worm," etc.

027. While not in quality, the subject and style is similair in both "The Devils" and "Lair of the White Worm."

028. The difference is that there is a quartet of heroes in "Lair of the White Worm," and so far, but a solo hero in "The Devils." No wonder the heroes in "Lair of the White Worm" seemingly had more success.

To be continued . . .

"The Devils" (1971) Ken Russell 3/23
The 3rd 5 minute segment

012. Again we see Ken's fondness for the hallucinatory dream sequence.

013. The exact like cannot be done again, because the film is very much a product of its time: the late '60's and the early '70's.

014. You rue their methods, but you cannot but applaud what they are trying to do: create a modern France.

To be continued . . .